|
Earrings
Nothing is more a sign of poverty than not
using earrings. Who would excuse a woman from the old days, no
matter how humble her origin, without her ‘arrecadas’? Without
the slightest sympathy, people would call her a ‘fanada’ (=
incomplete, with something missing).
To better judge how humiliating the lack of
earrings was, we just have to say that the women would promise
to the saints to remove them as a sacrifice – it was a very
special thing to take into consideration! Do not doubt that it
was a real torment to be considered ‘fanada’ during, one, two or
three months, sometimes even a year! That was why people would
comment: “In what state of despair she must have been in order
to promise such a thing!” really, that sort of promise was seen
as a truly stoic act!
To leave the pair of earrings in the
goldsmith’s was a rare thing, because one had to try to fool the
gossipy people. Therefore, the women would use the false
argument of the injured ear – the one that was without the
earring, of course! To better act this illusion, that is to say,
to better convince the others, she’d put grease in the
corresponding lobe.

Viana’s ‘Arrecadas’
They are also known as ‘argolas filigranadas’
(= filigree rings), of ‘bambolina’ or of ‘pelicano’ (=pelican),
which refers to the mobile moon crescent – these last two
designations are of popular origin. They are the heiresses of
the ‘Castrejas’, that suffered some metamorphosis till nowadays,
but still maintain its essence, though with minor alterations.
It’s one of the few cases of goldsmithery
where the upper social class imitated pieces of a more popular
origin.
Nowadays they have a circular shape, with
the lunule in the ‘bambolina’ or pelican, ‘SS’ and an inverted
triangle as a finishing. They’re made with open ‘filigrana’, can
have a ‘conta’ from Viana in the rabbet of the lock or all
around it (usually five).

The more
‘fidalgas’ (=more sophisticated)
are made with thinner and tighter ‘filigrana’ and sometimes with
some precious stones, without the pelican.
|